I always have a keen question in mind that even fitness athletes and professionals bodybuilders share same stage in Olympia, the price money for winners in fitness model zone is nothing in comparison to professional bodybuilders as winners.
I feel this as a direct discrimination because both side athletes do the same sort of effort, expense and dedication.
Why we measure price money in respect of their body size? I think, it is the quality of sport or athletes that is directly proportional to how much price money should be provided to them. Money should not be relative to quantity of muscles they put on but relative to how well they present themselves with more acquisitions on stage that makes judges to give low, average, above average and high points for them.
The is against the science, and philosophy associated with bodybuilding i.e. two different person can be best in their class, every body has definite entity and independent assortment, and we are in a search of ideals who can give same lessons even they come from different zones. So both athletes should be compensated in respect of how well they can lead and present themselves as a role model and how fruitful are the consequences.
Meanwhile, since fitness athletes are not happy with this esp. this will put them always in economic crisis so most of them are bulking themselves to compete in professional bodybuilding, the zone of fitness model bodybuilding will be extinct.
No comments:
Post a Comment